In addition, the programs are affordable and offer a lot for their money, making them a good alternative to Adobe's programs for most ambitious photographers.ĭespite my criticism of the complexity of Luminar Neo, I am curious and look forward to putting the program through its paces. Contrary to Adobe's policy, Skylum continues to rely on purchase models (instead of subscription). So, if you want to work creatively and don't want to spend too much time learning the editing program, Luminar Neo is certainly very interesting.īut if you really need to work in a complex and targeted way, you probably won't be able to get around Photoshop.Īn additional big plus for Skylum's programs is the price. In addition to a long training period, regular further training is also helpful for this, as new functions and changes are constantly being added.Īt least the learning curve should be much less with Luminar Neo than with Photoshop, since the program is designed to work intuitively. Skylum has announced a new vision for Luminar Neo that is built on paid Extensions. However, I also know Photoshop very well and use it regularly. So far it seems like the choice of tools is limited. Personally, I'm not quite sure what I think of Luminar NEO yet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |